Policy to configuration
Connect policy requirements to controls, configuration standards, and the systems they are meant to cover.
Security coverage review
From claimed protection
to supported conclusions.
Start with one business service, control area, or set of requirements.
Coverage to evidence
Review whether scans, access records, exceptions, and control assessments support the claimed coverage—including their scope and age.
Gaps to action
Distinguish missing evidence from confirmed weaknesses. Set next steps using business impact and exposure, with clear ownership and closure evidence.
Your evidence. A focused review.
Know what is supported.
Resolve what is not.
Use the policies, findings, asset records, and control evidence you already have. Receive an expert-reviewed coverage assessment and action plan for your existing workflows.
Define the question
Agree on the requirements, systems, evidence, and decisions the review will cover.
Examine the support
Trace conclusions to source records. Keep assumptions, evidence gaps, and conflicting observations visible.
Make the next step clear
Document supported conclusions, unresolved coverage, and recommended actions for the responsible teams.
See an example coverage gap
Illustrative example. Not a client result.
- Requirement
- Limit administrative access to approved accounts.
- Claimed coverage
- The control dashboard marks the requirement as satisfied.
- Available evidence
- A server passes its hardening checks. An automation account has broad administrative permissions, but its exception covers only some of them.
- Assessment
- The evidence supports narrower coverage than the dashboard reports. Passing hardening checks does not resolve permissions outside the exception.
- Recommended action
- Investigate uncovered permissions, validate or revise the exception, and correct the control assessment as needed.
- Closure evidence
- Document the reviewed accounts, applicable approvals, scope, and results before updating the control status.
AI-assisted analysis. Expert-reviewed conclusions.
AI assists our evidence review. Groundwork checks conclusions against source material and reviews recommendations before delivery. Missing evidence stays visible; it is not treated as proof of protection.
Tools and data-handling arrangements are agreed before client information is shared.
Start with one focused review
Where does your coverage need a closer look?
Tell us which service or control area you want to examine. We’ll agree on the scope, deliverables, timeline, and fee before work begins.
Discuss a coverage reviewKeep your first email high-level. We’ll arrange secure handling before exchanging sensitive data.